fbpx

As Religiosity Changes, Donor Engagement Needs to Adapt

Tamela Spicer, Program Manager

Some estimates suggest that the percentage of U.S. giving that goes to religious or religiously-affiliated organizations could be as much as 73 percent or more. But with Americans’ religious and spiritual habits changing, the future of this giving could be uncertain.

You’re invited to join us April 16 for “Faith and Philanthropy,” a webinar exploring the themes laid out in the blog piece and some of the main challenges and opportunities that arise when individuals and foundations consider giving to faith-based nonprofits.

Since the late 1950s, when Giving USA first began tracking charitable giving in the United States, gifts to religious organizations have garnered a larger share of philanthropic dollars than any other sub-sector. Measuring only gifts to “congregations, missions, religious media, and other related organizations,” giving to religion-related causes accounts for less than one-third (31 percent) of all charitable gifts in the country, according to Giving USA 2018 data. That does not account for gifts to organizations like The Salvation Army, Islamic Relief USA, or thousands of other organizations that identify as faith-based and also work within other subsectors.

Research tells us that individuals with a religious affiliation are more inclined to give and often at higher levels (Giving USA, 2018 & Li, 2016). Religious people’s giving is not limited to religious organizations as defined by Giving USA; religious people are 3 percent more likely to support secular causes than those who do not identify as religious (Li, 2016). The amount that religious households give annually is more than double that of households with no religious connection (Austin, 2017).

We can’t ignore that giving to faith-based organizations is also being done differently as we see continued growth in donor advised funds, both through community foundations and religious-based foundations. The National Christian Foundation, which manages donor advised funds, reported grants in excess of $1.3 million in 2017, and the American Muslim Fund, formed as a non-place-based community fund in 2016, dispersed over $123,000 in 2017 from donor advised funds.

Clustering spiritual beliefs and practices rather than identifying individuals based on religious denomination, Pew focuses on key indicators that either unite or divide people.

Although religious giving continues to hold strong, growth has slowed to less than one percent annually in the past few years (Giving USA, 2018). At the same time, we are experiencing a surge in the number of people who do not identify with any particular religious tradition, including those that self-identify as atheist or agnostic (Pew, 2012). These “nones” now represent some 23 percent of the population in this country (Lipka, 2015). As one may expect, millennials represent roughly 35 percent of these religiously unaffiliated individuals, although the group is widely diverse across ethnic, educational, and income demographics (Lipka, 2015).

The connection between religious identity and giving is further complicated by the changing landscape and language of spirituality. The Pew Research Center released a report in August 2018 developing a new typology to describe religious affiliation in this changing environment. Clustering spiritual beliefs and practices rather than identifying individuals based on religious denomination, Pew focuses on key indicators that either unite or divide people. The seven classifications range from “Sunday Stalwarts” — traditionally religious people — to “Solidly Secular” — those who hold no religious belief (Pew, 2018).

While this new typology isn’t meant to replace traditional classifications of religious people (Catholic, Protestants, Jewish, Muslim, etc.), it does offer a new way of thinking about religious affiliation that could inform and impact philanthropy in the future. As participation in organized religion continues to decline, a deeper understanding of spiritual practices and values could inform philanthropic engagement.


This piece originally appeared in 11 Trends in Philanthropy for 2019. Download and read the full report, featuring all 11 trends, here.


References:

Austin, T. (Fall 2017). Giving USA special report on giving to religion. Giving USA Foundation. Chicago, Il.
Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service. (2017). Return of organization exempt from income tax (Form 990). Retrieved from https://16nuog20abqw1uevls3t0xiy-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Form990Package-AMF-Final.pdf
Giving USA (2018) Giving USA 2018: The annual report on philanthropy for the year 2017, a publication of Giving USA Foundation, 2018, researched and written by the Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy. Available online at www.givingusa.org.
Li, Y. (2017). Is methodology destiny? Religiosity and charitable giving. International Journal of Social Economics, 44(9), 1197–1210. Retrieved from https://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/abs/10.1108/IJSE-04-2016-0118
Lipka, M. (2015, May 13). A closer look at America’s rapidly growing religious ‘nones’. Retrieved from http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/05/13/a-closer-look-at-americas-rapidly-growing-religious-nones
National Christian Foundation. (2018). National Christian Charitable Foundation, Inc. and supporting organizations consolidated financial statements with independent auditors’ report December 31, 2017 and 2016. Retrieved from https://national.ncfgiving.com/uploads/files/resources/ncf_17_consolidated_fs.pdf
Pew Research Center. (2018, August 29). The religious typology. Retrieved from http://www.pewforum.org/2018/08/29/religious-and-spiritual-practices-and-beliefs-2


Photo: Tamela SpicerTamela Spicer, M.A.is the program manager for nonprofit services at the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy at Grand Valley State University. She works primarily with faith-based clients, and specializes in organizational structure, fund development, and strategic planning. Learn more about Tamela.


 

Post a comment